Measurement apparatus of vectorial optical fields

ABSTRACT

An apparatus measures the transverse profile of vectorial optical field beams, including at least the directional intensity complex amplitude and the polarization spatial profile. The apparatus contains a polarization separation module, a weak perturbation module, and a detection module. Characterizing the transverse profile of vector fields provides an optical metrology tool for both fundamental studies of vectorial optical fields and a wide spectrum of applications, including microscopy, surveillance, imaging, communication, material processing, and laser trapping.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of, claims priority to andincorporates entirely by reference U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/396,618, which claims priority to Provisional Patent Application Ser.No. 62/690,114 filed on Jun. 26, 2018.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

This invention was made with government support under Grant No.N00014-17-1-2443, awarded by the Office of Naval Research. TheGovernment has certain rights in the invention.

FIELD

The disclosure generally relates to methods and systems implementingencoded communication protocols that utilize vectorial optical fields asthe information carrier.

BACKGROUND

This disclosure explains systems and methods of using phase differencesin optical signals to encode data that can be subject to accuratedecoding at a receiving end. Earlier technologies for this kind of workinclude differential phase shift keying protocols that detect changes inphase to transfer a bit of information. Quadrature differential phaseshift keying (4-DPSK) is similar but uses one symbol to transfer twobits of information.

The embodiments provided herein address two challenges in opticalcommunication. One is how to increase the photon efficiency orinformation density on an optical link. The second challenge is how tocarry information through turbid media without data degradation.

SUMMARY

This disclosure describes two communication protocols that utilizevectorial optical fields as the information carrier. Forhigh-dimensional communication, the information is directly encoded asdifferent vectorial modes, and is decoded by using specific differentialspatial phase decoders. For multiplexed operation, each channel uses onevectorial mode, and the information are sent through different modessimultaneously. These protocols have high photon efficiency by utilizingthe vectorial mode degree of freedom of light, and the protocols arerobust against propagating through turbid media.

The spatial polarization profile of a vector beam is much betterretained through turbulence upon implementing efficient encoding anddecoding methods. In one embodiment, this disclosure utilizesvector-scalar beam conversion for decoding operations.

In another embodiment, the disclosure is characterized as a highdimension communication protocol for optical signals using vector beams

In another embodiment, the disclosure describes an apparatus that canmeasure the transverse profile of vectorial optical fields (beams),including both the phase and the polarization spatial profile. Theapparatus contains a polarization separation module, a weak perturbationmodule, and a detection module. The unique capability of fullycharacterizing the transverse profile of vector fields can provide apowerful optical metrology tool for both fundamental studies ofvectorial optical fields and a wide spectrum of applications, includingmicroscopy, surveillance, imaging, communication, material processing,laser trapping, and the like.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are in and constitute a part of thisspecification, illustrate certain examples of the present disclosure andtogether with the description, serve to explain, without limitation, theprinciples of the disclosure. Like numbers represent the same element(s)throughout the figures.

FIG. 1A is a schematic representation of data (information) encoded onvector vortex modes having left and right circular polarization.

FIG. 1B is a schematic representation of discrete phase changes in data(information) encoded on vector vortex modes having left and rightcircular polarization as shown in FIG. 1A.

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the encoding and decodingprocess applied to the data of FIGS. 1A and 1B.

FIG. 3A is a schematic representation of the encoding and decodingprocess applied in higher dimensionality data.

FIG. 3B is a tabular representation of decoded outputs applied to higherdimensionality input data shown in FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4A is a schematic representation of Differential Phase Shift Keyingusing vector vortex analysis according to this disclosure.

FIG. 4B is a schematic representation of Differential Spatial PhaseShift Keying using vector vortex analysis according to this disclosure.

FIG. 5 is an image of an optical signal subject to mimicked turbulenceapplied as a random phase screen.

FIG. 6A is a series of optical images showing beam characteristics foran optical signal propagated through varied turbulence strength forgiven orbital angular momentum (OAM) and vector beam modes.

FIG. 6B is a signal cross talk matrix of outputs from the correspondingbeams of FIG. 6A.

FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram showing additive radial and azimuthalvector beams according to this disclosure

FIG. 7B is a schematic diagram showing full Poincaré beams according tothis disclosure.

FIG. 8 is an example of optical equipment set up for differentialspatial phase shift keying (DSPSK) encoding according to thisdisclosure.

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram showing full orbital angular momentum(OAM) encoding beams according to this disclosure.

FIG. 10A is a schematic diagram comparing OAM and DSPSK beamcharacteristics in the presence of varied turbulence strength accordingto this disclosure.

FIG. 10B is a signal cross talk matrix of outputs from the correspondingbeams of FIG. 10A.

FIG. 11A is a schematic representation of higher order dimensions ofencoding at Level 11 DSPSK according to this disclosure.

FIG. 11B is a schematic representation of higher order dimensions ofencoding at Level 17 DSPSK according to this disclosure.

FIG. 11C is a schematic representation of higher order dimensions ofencoding at Level 12 DSPSK according to this disclosure.

FIG. 11D is a schematic representation of higher order dimensions ofencoding at Level 18 DSPSK according to this disclosure.

FIG. 12A is a schematic representation of a vector beam with a DSPSKscheme of encoding in zero turbulence according to this disclosure.

FIG. 12B is a schematic representation of a vector beam with a DSPSKscheme of encoding in weak turbulence according to this disclosure.

FIG. 12C is a schematic representation of a vector beam with a DSPSKscheme of encoding in moderate turbulence according to this disclosure.

FIG. 13 is a schematic representation of a vector beam signal power witha DSPSK scheme of encoding according to this disclosure.

FIG. 14 is a schematic representation of a vector beam signal power witha DSPSK scheme of encoding according to this disclosure.

FIG. 15A is a schematic representation of a vector beam with aasymmetrical DSPSK scheme of encoding in no turbulence according to thisdisclosure.

FIG. 15B is a schematic representation of a vector beam with aasymmetrical DSPSK scheme of encoding in weak turbulence according tothis disclosure.

FIG. 15C is a schematic representation of a vector beam with aasymmetrical DSPSK scheme of encoding in moderate turbulence accordingto this disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description of the disclosure is provided as an enablingteaching of the disclosure in its best, currently known embodiment(s).To this end, those skilled in the relevant art will recognize andappreciate that many changes can be made to the various embodiments ofthe invention described herein, while still obtaining the beneficialresults of the present disclosure. It will also be apparent that some ofthe desired benefits of the present disclosure can be obtained byselecting some of the features of the present disclosure withoututilizing other features. Accordingly, those who work in the art willrecognize that many modifications and adaptations to the presentdisclosure are possible and can even be desirable in certaincircumstances and are a part of the present disclosure. Thus, thefollowing description is provided as illustrative of the principles ofthe present disclosure and not in limitation thereof.

Terminology

Vector modes disclosed herein are optical beams that have complextransverse polarization and phase profiles, including but not limited toradial and azimuthal vector beams and full Poincaré beams.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill inthe art to which this invention belongs.

As used in the specification and claims, the singular form “a,” “an,”and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictatesotherwise. For example, the term “an agent” includes a plurality ofagents, including mixtures thereof.

As used herein, the terms “can,” “may,” “optionally,” “can optionally,”and “may optionally” are used interchangeably and are meant to includecases in which the condition occurs as well as cases in which thecondition does not occur. Thus, for example, the statement that aformulation “may include an excipient” is meant to include cases inwhich the formulation includes an excipient as well as cases in whichthe formulation does not include an excipient.

Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value,and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range isexpressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular valueand/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values areexpressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it willbe understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. Itwill be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges aresignificant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently ofthe other endpoint. It is also understood that there are a number ofvalues disclosed herein, and that each value is also herein disclosed as“about” that particular value in addition to the value itself. Forexample, if the value “10” is disclosed, then “about 10” is alsodisclosed.

Publications cited herein are hereby specifically by reference in theirentireties and at least for the material for which they are cited.

For spatial polarization profiles, such as vector modes of communicationdescribed herein, information may be modeled as being carried by therelative phase between two orthogonally-polarized components. The phasedifference is spatially varying and can span multiple dimensions. Takingadvantage of the phase difference for information transmission involvesencoding the information with vector vortex modes and then decoding theinformation by applying polarization-dependent, spatially varying phasemasks before interferometric detection.

Information carried by light may be characterized as either transmittingdata in one dimensional space, two-dimensional space, or even higherdimensionality. In one dimensional space, the light signal isessentially on and off to provide respective single bits of information.In two-dimensional space, the optical signals have complex amplitudesand are not orthogonal. As the dimensionality increases, the states ofphotons in the light are not orthogonal, requiring a balance betweenefficiency in encoding and transmission and accuracy in decoding. Inthis disclosure, the examples utilize vector modes with optical beamshaving complicated and multi-faceted transverse polarization and phaseprofiles (i.e., vector beams). The vector beams may incorporate radialvectors, azimuthal vectors, and/or full Poincaré vector beams asillustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B.

This disclosure utilizes a vector beam basis for light encoding andshows how the phase shift of left and right circularly polarized lightis detectable for decoding. The encoding and decoding processillustrates that input optical signals are encoded according to phasefor decoding at an opposite end via a polarizing beam splitter for phaseshift detection. The disclosure utilizes directly measured real andimaginary parts of the left- and right-handed circular polarizationcomponents of a vector beam that has uniform amplitude over a circularaperture and Zernike polynomial Z2/4 and Z-2/2 phase profiles. Thesevector vortex beams are comprised of LG 0,1 and LG 0,−1Laguerre-Gaussian beams as the polarization components and withdifferent phase difference between the two polarization components.

Vector beams [1], characterized by their spatially-varying polarizationstates, have garnered tremendous popularity recently due to theirpotential applications in optical microscopy [2, 3], optical tweezers[4], optical metrology [5], laser material processing [6], and opticalcommunication [7-10]. Over the past few years, many methods have beeninvestigated to generate vector beams using e.g., spatial lightmodulators (SLM) [11, 12], Q-plates [13-15], optical fibers [16, 17],and metamaterials [18, 19].

To date, most studies have characterized vector beams using imagingpolarimetry [20], where intensity images are obtained of the beam afterpassing through polarization filtering. While such a method convenientlyreveals the spatial polarization profile of vector beams, it does notprovide any information about the relative phase between the fields atany two points across the beam. Some methods have characterized vectorbeams composed of a limited number of selected spatial polarizationmodes [21, 22], but since the limited number of modes typically do notspan a complete mode basis set, these methods are also incapable offully describing the transverse profile of a vector beam. There arenumerous techniques that can measure the transverse phase profile ofscalar beams, which include shear interferometry[23], Shack-Hartmannmicrolens array [24, 25], point diffraction interferometry [26-28],phase-shifting interferometry [23], phase retrieval [29], conoscopicholography [30, 31], tomographic imaging [32], and coherencemeasurements [33]. However, these available phase measurement techniquesare all designed for scalar beams and cannot be reveal the polarizationprofile of vector beams.

From an information retrieval point of view, both the transversepolarization and phase profile of a vector beam carry information, andtherefore a characterization method that can reveal information encodedin all the degrees of freedom available in a vector beam is naturallydesired. Furthermore, in many applications, including imaging andcommunication, a vector beam typically needs to propagate through anoptical system or interact with various optical elements. With theknowledge of both polarization and phase profiles, one can predict theevolution of vector beams upon propagating through an optical system oreven free space. With the current surge of fundamental studies andapplications, there is a huge demand for the development of ahigh-efficiency characterization method with the capability to fullycharacterize vector beams.

This disclosure shows a direct measurement method that is capable ofmeasuring the complete transverse spatial profile of both polarizationand complex-amplitude of a fully-polarized vector beam in a single shot.The term “direct measurement” was first introduced in the context ofquantum state metrology [34]. It refers to metrology protocols in whichthe measurement readouts directly cor respond to the complex-valuedstate vector or other quantities that describe the quantum system to bemeasured [35-40]. Compared to conventional quantum state tomography,direct measurement offers an alternative metrology technique that cangreatly reduce the experimental complexity involved in characterizing ahigh-dimensional quantum system. The embodiments of this disclosure showa direct measurement protocol by experimentally generating andcharacterizing various vector beams, including vector vortex beams andfull Poincaré beams that are often used in applications. The uniquesingle-shot, full characterization capability of the method provides apowerful real-time metrology tool that can boost fundamental studies ofvector optical fields as well as a wide spectrum of applications ofvector beams.

While various direct measurement protocols have been developed inquantum mechanical language, most of them can be described andunderstood equally well in the classical picture. Thus, the directmeasurement protocol herein uses physical optics terminology. Aspatially-coherent vector beam can be described by the superposition oftwo scalar beams with orthogonal polarizations. In the circularpolarization basis, for example, the transverse vectorial field profileE(u, v) at the initial (u, v) plane can be written as follows:

E ^(→)(u, v)=ê

E

(u, v)+êr Er(u, v),   (1)

where e

and er denote the unit vectors in the left- and right circularpolarization (LCP and RCP) basis, respectively, and E

(u, v) and Er (u, v) denote the transverse complex-amplitude profile ofthe two circular polarization components, respectively. In order tofully characterize the transverse profile of a vector beam defined byEq. (1), one must first introduce a relative transverse shift 2dubetween the two polarization components of the vector beam. Here thevalue of du is chosen to be slightly larger than the radius of the beamsuch that the two polarization components are non-overlapping. At thesame time, adjusting the polarization of the two components into thesame horizontal linear polarization state is necessary. Since the totalbeam now has two spatially-separated parts, referred to as the“twin-beam”. The field profile of the twin-beam ex Es (u, v), after suchpolarization separation and adjustment can be written as follows:

êxEs (u, v)=êx [E

(u+δu, v)+Er(u−δu, v)].   (2)

Since the twin-beam has now become a spatially-coherent scalar beam of asingle polarization, one may apply the recently developed scan-freedirect measurement technique [40] to characterize its total transversebeam profile. Specifically, the experimental apparatus is based on a 4-fimaging system, where f is the focal length of the lenses. For atwin-beam exEs(u, v) at the input plane of the 4-f system, the field atthe focal plane between the two lenses is the Fourier transform of Es(u,v) as follows:

Ep ^(→)(zeta, eta)=(êx Ep(zeta, eta))=êx F {Es (u, v)},   (3)

where the variables denote the transverse coordinates on the focalplane. A weak perturbation, in the form of a small polarization rotationof angle a, is applied to the field over a diffraction limited area inthe vicinity of the center of Ep (x, h). After such a weak polarizationperturbation, the total field exiting the focal plane has twopolarization components, which can be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix}{{E^{\rightarrow\prime}{p\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)}} = {{{\left( {\hat{e}x\mspace{11mu} {{Ep}\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)}} \right)\left\lbrack {1 + {\left( {{\cos \; \alpha} - 1} \right){\delta \left( {{{zeta} - {{zeta}\; 0}},{{eta} - {{eta}\; 0}}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack} + {\hat{e}y\mspace{11mu} {{{Ep}\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)}\left\lbrack {\sin \; {{\alpha\delta}\left( {{{zeta} - {{zeta}\; 0}},{{eta} - {{eta}\; 0}}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} \approx {{\hat{e}x\mspace{11mu} {{Ep}\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)}} + {\hat{e}y\mspace{11mu} \alpha \; {{Ep}\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)}{{\delta \left( {{{zeta} - {{zeta}\; 0}},{{eta} - {{eta}\; 0}}} \right)}.}}}}} & (4)\end{matrix}$

where a is the angle of polarization rotation and d(x−x0, h−h0) is Diracdelta function centered at (x0, h0). One sees that when the angle ofpolarization rotation a is sufficiently small, the x-polarized componentat the Fourier plane can be approximated as the original unperturbedfield Ep(x, h), and the generated y-polarized field is essentially apoint source located at (x0, h0).

The field at the image (x, y) plane of the 4-f system is the Fouriertransform of the weakly-perturbed field at the focal plane, can befurther converted to the horizontal and vertical (H and V) polarizationcomponents into RCP and LCP, respectively. The final detected field canbe written as follows:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{E^{\rightarrow\prime}{\det \left( {x,y} \right)}} = \left( {{\hat{e}\; \mspace{11mu} F\left\{ {{Ep}\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)} \right\}} +} \right.} \\{{\hat{e}r\mspace{11mu} F\left\{ {\alpha \mspace{11mu} {{Ep}\left( {{zeta},{eta}} \right)}{\delta \left( {{{zeta} - {{zeta}\; 0}},{{eta} - {{eta}\; 0}}} \right)}} \right\}}} \\{\approx {{\hat{e}\; \mspace{11mu} E^{\prime}{s\left( {x,y} \right)}} + {\hat{e}r\mspace{11mu} {{{Eref}\left( {x,y} \right)}.}}}}\end{matrix} & (5)\end{matrix}$

where E′s (x, y)=Es (−x,−y) is the flipped version of the twin-beam, andEref (x, y)=B exp (i2p(x0x+h0y)/1f) is an orthogonally-polarizedreference field generated through the weak polarization perturbationprocess, and is essentially a plane wave of constant amplitude B and awell-defined linear phase profile.

One sees that the polarization state of the detected field varies acrossthe transverse (x, y) detection plane, which can be expressed in termsof Stokes parameters as follows:

S1, det(x, y)=Ih, det(x, y)−Iv, det(x, y),   (6)

S2, det(x, y)=Id, det(x, y)−Ia, det(x, y),   (7)

where Ih, Iv, Id and Ia are the intensity profile of the field componentin the horizontal, vertical, diagonal and anti-diagonal linearpolarization states, respectively, and are given by

I h, det=1/2|E′s| ²+1/2|Eref|² +R{E′s, E*ref},   (8)

I v, det=1/2|E′s| ²+1/2|Eref|² +R{E′s, E*ref},   (9)

I d, det=1/2|E′s| ²+1/2|Eref|² +R{E′s, E*ref},   (10)

I a, det=1/2|E′s| ²+1/2|Eref|² +R{E′s, E*ref}.   (11)

R(x) and I(x) denote the real and imaginary parts of the complexquantity x, respectively. Here, the spatial dependence of all thequantities are not explicitly shown for simplicity. Using these results,one can obtain the following relation between the Stokes parameters andthe transverse field profile of the twin-beam, E′s:

S1,det(x,y)=2R{E′s(x, y)E*ref(x,y)},

S2,det(x,y)=−2I{E′s(x, y)E*ref(x,y)}.   (12)

The transverse complex amplitude profile of the twin-beam is thereforegiven by

$\begin{matrix}\frac{{E^{\prime}{s\left( {x,y} \right)}} = {{S_{1,\det}\left( {x,y} \right)} - {{iS}_{2,\det}\left( {x,y} \right)}}}{2E*{{ref}\left( {x,y} \right)}} & (13)\end{matrix}$

The above expression shows that after the weak polarizationperturbation, the polarization state of the final detected field,expressed in the linear basis, is directly proportional to the real andimaginary part, respectively, of the transverse complex amplitudeprofile of the twin-beam. According to Eq. (2), the left and right partsof the field profile of the twin-beam Es(u, v) after coordinate flippingis exactly the transverse profile of the two polarization components, E

(u, v) and Er(u, v), respectively, of the vector beam to be measured.Furthermore, since the two polarization components are measuredsimultaneously, the relative phase information between them is retained,which is essential for revealing its polarization profile. The Stokesparameters of the vector beam under test can then be obtained throughthe following relations:

S0(u, v)=|E

(u, v)|² +|Er(u, v)|²   (14)

S1(u, v)=2R{E*

(u, v)Er(u, v)}  (15)

S2(u, v)=−2R{E*

(u, v)Ef(u, v)}  (16)

S3(u, v)=|E

(u, v)|² −|Er(u, v)|²   (17)

To demonstrate a direct measurement protocol for vector beams, thisdisclosures describes constructing an experimental set up which includesboth a vector beam generation module and a direct measurementcharacterization module. The method for generating the vector beam isadapted from [41]. A beam from a 532-nm laser (Coherent Compass M315)with horizontal polarization is expanded and launched onto a spatiallight modulator (SLM-1; Cambridge Correlaters SDE1024). In onenon-limiting embodiment, a computer-generated hologram (CGH) isimprinted on SLM-1, and the diffracted light passes through a 4-fimaging system with spatial filtering at the focal plane. Such a setupcan generate a field with any desired spatial profile with a high degreeof control [42, 43] at the output of the 4-f system. Here the systemsets the desired spatial field to be two transversely separated coherentbeams, corresponding to the LCP and RCP components of the desired vectorbeam. A Sagnac interferometer is placed between the second lens and theimage plane of the generation 4-f system, which is composed of apolarizing beam splitter (PBS) and two mirrors. Before the twin-beamenters the Sagnac interferometer, its polarization is adjusted to 45°using a polarizer. As the twin beam enters the Sagnac interferometer, itis split by the PBS into horizontally- and vertically-polarizedcomponents which then pass through the interferometer in oppositedirections. The Sagnac interferometer is adjusted such that the twopolarization components experience a transverse shift at the output.Specifically, the left side of the H-polarized output overlaps with theright side of the V-polarized output. A quarter wave plate (QWP) is usedto convert the H- and V-polarized components into LCP and RCPcomponents, respectively. An iris is then used to only allow thegenerated vector beam to pass. As a result, the vector beam produced bythe generation module has its two circular polarization componentsdetermined by the left and right part of the CGH on SLM-1, respectively.The direct measurement module is also built based on a 4-f imagingsystem, whose object plane overlaps with the output image plane of thebeam generation module. A second Sagnac interferometer is insertedbefore the first lens to transform the vector beam into a twin-beam witha transverse shift of 2du between the horizontal and verticalpolarization components. When a QWP is used before the Sagnacinterferometer, the vector beam characterization is effectivelyperformed in the circular-polarization basis. When this QWP is absent,the beam characterization is performed in the horizontal and verticallinear polarization basis. A polarizer is placed after the Sagnacinterferometer to set the twin-beam uniformly polarized in the diagonaldirection. A phase-only SLM (SLM-2; Hamamatsu X10468) is placed at thefocal plane of the characterization 4-f system to perform the weakpolarization perturbation. SLM-2 only responds to horizontally-polarizedlight, and is operating in the reflection mode. The birefringentresponse of SLM-2 effectively alters the polarization of the reflectedlight. The phase on SLM-2 is set to zero everywhere except for a smallarea near the center of the focused beam, which is given a non-zerophase value. The size of the small area (80 μm by 80 μm) is comparableto the diffraction-limited spot size, and therefore the generatedanti-diagonally-polarized reference field at the detection plane can beexpressed analytically. A polarization-resolving camera (4D TechnologyPolarCam) is placed at the detection plane with a QWP in front of it.The QWP converts the diagonally and anti-diagonally polarized signal andreference fields into left- and right-handed circular polarizations,respectively.

The camera includes a micro-polarizer array that contains a pattern oflinear polarizers (oriented at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°), capable ofresolving Ih, Iv, Id, and Ia (i.e., the irradiance at horizontal,vertical, diagonal, and anti-diagonal). Since all four polarizations canbe measured simultaneously, the direct measurement of a vector beam canbe performed in a single shot. Note that the polarization-resolvingcamera can be replaced by a combination of beam splitters, polarizationoptics and a regular camera [40].

To demonstrate the capability of a direct measurement protocol, testinga variety of vector beams includes several that are commonly used inapplications. First, the test generates a vector beam that has uniformamplitude over a circular aperture and Zernike polynomial phaseprofiles, Z2/4 and Z-2/2, encoded into the LCP and RCP components,respectively. The directly-measured real and imaginary parts of the twocircular polarization components are shown in FIGS. 2(a)-(d). Thecorresponding phase profile of the two components as well as theprofiles of three normalized Stokes parameters, are shown in FIGS.2(e)-(i), respectively. One sees that experimental results match wellwith the theoretical expectations, shown as insets in the upper-rightcorner of each figure. To quantitatively evaluate direct measurementresults, the beam fidelity is used as a figure of merit, which isdefined as follows:

$\begin{matrix}\frac{F \equiv {{\Sigma \; p{\int{{E_{p,\exp}\left( {x,y} \right)}{E_{p,{the}}^{*}\left( {x,y} \right)}{dxdy}}}}}}{\sqrt{\Sigma \; p{\int{{{E_{p,\exp}\left( {x,y} \right)}}^{2}{dxdy}}}}\sqrt{\Sigma \; p{\int{{{E_{p,\exp}\left( {x,y} \right)}}^{2}{dxdy}}}}} & (18)\end{matrix}$

where the subscript p denotes the polarization components for the chosenbasis, and Ep,exp and Ep,the denote the experimental results andtheoretical predictions, respectively. The fidelity of the circularvector beam with uniform amplitude and Zernike polynomial phase profilesare calculated to be approximately 0.95, and similar high fidelity isobserved for a variety of tested vector beams with different Zernikephase profiles. The high fidelity of our results demonstrates that ourtechnique is capable of accurately measuring the complex field profilesas well as the polarization profile of vector beams. The resolution ofour experimental result is approximately 100,000 pixels, which islimited by the numerical aperture of the imaging system and by the totalpixel count of the camera used in the experiment.

Second, measuring a family of four vector vortex beams [1] that havebeen used for high-dimensional secure quantum communication [7, 8, 10]is completed. These four vector vortex beams use LG0,1 and LG0,−1Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes as the two circular polarization componentswith an additional 0 or p phase difference between the two polarizationcomponents. Here LGp,l denotes the Laguerre-Gaussian mode with radialindex p and azimuthal index l. As a result, these four vector beams havethe same intensity profile but very different spatial polarizationprofiles. Since these four vector modes are orthogonal to each other,they can be used to represent 2 bits of information in aspatial-mode-encoding protocol. Direct measurement techniques hereinreveal the azimuthal phase profile of each LG mode as well as thedonut-shaped amplitude profile (illustrated by the saturation of eachplots). Moreover, mode 1 and mode 2 (same for mode 3 and mode 4) haveidentical transverse phase profiles for the LCP component, while the twoRCP components have the same spiral phase structure, but have anadditional “0” and “p” phase difference with respect to the LCPcomponent, respectively. This relative phase difference determines thatmode 1 is radially polarized and mode 2 is azimuthally polarized. Thedirect measurement method correctly measures the relative phasedifference between the two polarization components for each mode, whichcan lead to the correct spatial profile of Stokes parameters. This wouldnot have been possible if the complex field profiles of the twopolarization components are measured separately.

In some embodiments, this disclosure characterizes this vector vortexbeam in the circular polarization bases. Measurements reveal correctlythe amplitude and the phase of the LG0,1 and LG0,−1 modes in thecircular polarization bases with the correct relative phase difference,which leads to the expected Stokes parameter profiles as well. Aradially-polarized beam can also be constructed by the superposition ofHG1,0 and HG0,1 Hermite-Gaussian (HG) modes in the linear polarizationbasis [44]. When removing the quarter wave plate (“QWP”) at the veryfront of the characterization module, one can measure theradially-polarized beam in the H-V polarization basis.

Finally, in some embodiments, this disclosure demonstrates thegeneration and characterization of a full Poincaré beam, which hasattracted a lot of research interest for its richness in fundamentalphysics as well as its potential applications in imaging and particletracking [45]. A full-Poincaré beam is generated by superposing an LCPfundamental Gaussian mode and an RCP LG0,1 Laguerre-Gaussian mode.

FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate an example of the vector beam basis for lightencoding and shows how the phase shift of left and right circularlypolarized light is detectable for decoding. Information is encoded onthese vector vortex modes characterized by

ê

LG_(0, m)+/−ê_(r) LG_(0, −m)

The encoding and decoding process as shown in FIG. 2 illustrates thatinput optical signals are encoded according to phase for decoding at anopposite end via a polarizing beam splitter for phase shift detection.For high-dimensional communication, the information is directly encodedas different vectorial modes, and is decoded by using specificdifferential spatial phase decoders. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, theencoding levels can increase in dimensionality, forming the decodingarray as as shown in FIG. 3B.

Using the vectorial method of optical encoding allows for the opticalsignal to be modeled in accordance with FIG. 4A for differential phaseshift keying in which signals can be located along the circumference ofa unit circle. In FIG. 4B the differential spatial phase shift keying ofthis disclosure illustrates that higher levels of encoding data invarious spatial directions is possible, such as the data beingillustrated at tips of a high dimension octahedron as shown. Formultiplexed operation, each channel uses one vectorial mode, and theinformation are sent through different modes simultaneously. Theseprotocols have high photon efficiency by utilizing the vectorial modedegree of freedom of light, and the protocols are robust againstpropagating through turbid media.

One significant aspect of the work set forth herein lies in the use of arandom phase screen to mimic turbulence through which an optical signalmust traverse for decoding. FIG. 5 illustrates one non-limitingembodiment in which a modified von Karman model is used for theturbulence screen. FIG. 6A shows the successful results of decodingaccording to vector beam bases as set forth herein as compared toorbital angular momentum bases as well. FIG. 6B is a strong proof ofconcept, accordingly.

EXAMPLES

In certain examples discussed below, a turbulence characterizationincludes using a circular optical beam of uniform amplitude andmeasuring a phase profile with a reference planewave. An orbital angularmomentum (“OAM”) communication scheme is set up and the resultingoptical images show that even weak turbulence significantly deterioratesthe phase structure for decoding purposes. The OAM coding result showsconsiderable deterioration even in the presence of simply weakturbulence. In OAM encoding, each representation level corresponds to abeam with a specific orbital angular momentum (−2, −1, 0, 1, 2). Thisdisclosure and the examples shared below propose a high-dimensionalcommunication protocol differential spatial phase shift keying (DSPSK)using vector beams so that the communication is resistant to moderateand atmospheric turbulence and can operate without adaptive opticsmodules.

By contrast, using vector beams as illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B forthe optical modeling and encoding shows significantly strongerresilience in the face of the simulated turbulence. Even with moderateturbulence, using the vector analysis of this disclosure results insignificantly correct differential spatial phase shift keying decodingoperations. High levels of spatial encoding (up to level 18 as shown inthe appendix) are possible for efficient decoding according to thesystems and methods implemented herein.

In one non-limiting embodiment, equipment for this disclosure includesthe set-up shown in FIG. 8 for example. A computerized method oftransmitting information via an optical vector beam (250) starts withencoding the data onto a primary optical beam (200) to eventually formthe optical vector beam (250), wherein the encoding comprisesdifferential spatial phase shift keying (DSPSK) in which the data isrepresented by physical changes in the optical vector beam (250) acrossspatially separated portions of the optical vector beam field. Decodingthe data is accomplished by identifying respective polarization states(310, 320, 330) and respective phase measurements for the spatiallyseparated portions of the optical vector beam. Identifying the data inthe optical vector beam includes tracking differences between therespective directional intensity complex amplitudes for the at least twopolarized portions of the optical vector beam (250). As illustrated inFIG. 2, the signal bearing the information can be characterized by thedifference between two directional intensity values selected fromhorizontal complex intensity amplitude (Ih), vertical complex intensityamplitude (Iv), diagonal complex intensity amplitude (Id), andanti-diagonal complex intensity amplitude (Ia). The diagonal andanti-diagonal amplitudes are used to express amplitudes that cross eachother in the directions that span opposite directions across the opticalfield (i.e., the letter X has a diagonal component as one leg of theletter and an anti-directional component as the other leg).

In operation, the equipment shown in FIG. 8, a photon source (210) emitsan original optical beam (200) which is received by at least one spatiallight modulator (SLM) (215A) for a first level of encoding with any oneof the available input modes (217A, 217B, 217C) shown in FIG. 2. Asshown in FIG. 2, the SLMs of the equipment, along with variousreflectors, plates, and other optical components (not numbered) applyselected polarization and/or phase adjustments to the original opticalsignal. In the set-up of FIG. 8, more than one polarization input modecan be established by multiplexing signals with numerous SLMs (215B,215C), so long as a corresponding polarizing beam splitter (PBS) isavailable at a receiving end for de-multiplexing operations as shown inFIG. 3A and FIG. 3B. For testing puroposes, a turbulence cell (265) alsoreceived incoming optical signal(s). Ultimately, the encoded opticalvector beam reaches a polarizing imaging apparatus such as the camera(285) shown for example in FIG. 8. A computer encompassingmicro-processing capabilities is in electronic communication with thecamera (285) for decoding operations as set forth in FIGS. 2 and 3 forsingle mode transmission and higher order modes respectively. Theapparatus of FIG. 8 could encode a single selected input mode byappropriate configuration of the SLMs (215A, 215B, 215C) to accomplishsingle input mode operation. A different configuration of the SLMs canaccomplish a higher dimension transmission for decoding according toFIG. 3 with respectively incorporating polarizing beam splittingoperations.

In examples shown in the figures of this disclosure, the DSPSKtechniques are compared to other orbital angular momentum encodingdescribed above. To detect an OAM (L) beam, as shown in FIG. 9, oneapplies and OAM (−L) phase on the SLM and takes an image at the focalplane. At the center of the focal plane, a bright spot appears if theinput beam is in OAM(L) mode or void otherwise. This technique has beenused to show efficiency and accuracy of the DSPSK operations alsodescribed above.

FIG. 10A and FIG. 10B illustrate a comparison of the accuracies inherentin the DSPSK embodiments utilizing either single or multiplexed inputmodes for encoding (FIG. 1) and decoding (FIGS. 2 and 3, respectively).The DSPSK results for Stokes parameters as shown illustrate significantimprovement over OAM encoding even in the presence of strong turbulence.FIGS. 11A-11D illustrate the DSPSK efficacies at the higher levelencoding modes (11 (FIG. 11A), 12 (FIG. 11C), 17 (FIG. 11B), 18 (FIG.11D)) by which high dimension encoding has been used in terms ofdirectional complex intensity amplitudes and phases. FIGS. 12A, 12B,12C, 13, 14 illustrate the respective signal strengths at higherdimensional encoding operations even in the presence of different levelsof turbulence. Finally, FIGS. 15A, 15B, and 15C show the possibilitiesinherent in asymmetric coding using different forms of directionalintensity manipulation among the available horizontal, vertical,diagonal, and anti-diagonal kinds of directional intensities possibleaccording to this disclosure. In the example of FIG. 15 the encoding isaccomplished with dual encoding in the intensity domain via Iv and Idacross different levels of turbulence. The figures illustrate thatencoding across polarization states, phase status, and directionalintensity amplitudes holds up well in different levels of turbulence asshown.

Publications cited herein are hereby specifically by reference in theirentireties and at least for the material for which they are cited.

It should be understood that while the present disclosure has beenprovided in detail with respect to certain illustrative and specificaspects thereof, it should not be considered limited to such, asnumerous modifications are possible without departing from the broadspirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined in the appendedclaims. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims cover allsuch equivalent variations as fall within the true spirit and scope ofthe invention.

The present disclosure has been described with reference to exampleembodiments, however persons skilled in the art will recognize thatchanges may be made in form and detail without departing from the spiritand scope of the disclosed subject matter. For example, althoughdifferent example embodiments may have been described as including oneor more features providing one or more benefits, it is contemplated thatthe described features may be interchanged with one another oralternatively be combined with one another in the described exampleembodiments or in other alternative embodiments. Because the technologyof the present disclosure is relatively complex, not all changes in thetechnology are foreseeable. The present disclosure described withreference to the exemplary embodiments is manifestly intended to be asbroad as possible. For example, unless specifically otherwise noted, theexemplary embodiments reciting a single particular element alsoencompass a plurality of such particular elements.

Exemplary embodiments may include program products comprising computeror machine-readable media for carrying or having machine-executableinstructions or data structures stored thereon. For example, the sensingelectrode may be computer driven. Exemplary embodiments illustrated inthe methods of the figures may be controlled by program productscomprising computer or machine-readable media for carrying or havingmachine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Suchcomputer or machine-readable media can be any available media which canbe accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or othermachine with a processor. By way of example, such computer ormachine-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM orother optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magneticstorage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or storedesired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions ordata structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose orspecial purpose computer or other machine with a processor. Combinationsof the above are also included within the scope of computer ormachine-readable media. Computer or machine-executable instructionscomprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a generalpurpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purposeprocessing machines to perform a certain function or group of functions.Software implementations of the present disclosure could be accomplishedwith standard programming techniques with rule based logic and otherlogic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps,comparison steps and decision steps.

It is also important to note that the construction and arrangement ofthe elements of the system as shown in the preferred and other exemplaryembodiments is illustrative only. Although only a certain number ofembodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, thoseskilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciatethat many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes,dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements,values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors,orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novelteachings and advantages of the subject matter recited. For example,elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple partsor elements shown as multiple parts may be integrally formed, theoperation of the assemblies may be reversed or otherwise varied, thelength or width of the structures and/or members or connectors or otherelements of the system may be varied, the nature or number of adjustmentor attachment positions provided between the elements may be varied. Itshould be noted that the elements and/or assemblies of the system may beconstructed from any of a wide variety of materials that providesufficient strength or durability. Accordingly, all such modificationsare intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure.The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied orre-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions,modifications, changes and omissions may be made in the design,operating conditions and arrangement of the preferred and otherexemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the presentsubject matter.

Disclosed are components that can be used to perform the disclosedmethods and systems. These and other components are disclosed herein,and it is understood that when combinations, subsets, interactions,groups, etc. of these components are disclosed that while specificreference of each various individual and collective combinations andpermutation of these may not be explicitly disclosed, each isspecifically contemplated and described herein, for all methods andsystems. This applies to all aspects of this application including, butnot limited to, steps in disclosed methods. Thus, if there are a varietyof additional steps that can be performed it is understood that each ofthese additional steps can be performed with any specific embodiment orcombination of embodiments of the disclosed methods.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the methods andsystems may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, anentirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software andhardware aspects. Furthermore, the methods and systems may take the formof a computer program product on a computer-readable storage mediumhaving computer-readable program instructions (e.g., computer software)embodied in the storage medium. More particularly, the present methodsand systems may take the form of web-implemented computer software. Anysuitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including harddisks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.

Embodiments of the methods and systems are described herein withreference to block diagrams and flowchart illustrations of methods,systems, apparatuses and computer program products. It will beunderstood that each block of the block diagram and flowchartillustration can be implemented by computer program instructions. Thesecomputer program instructions may be loaded onto a general-purposecomputer, special purpose computer, or other programmable dataprocessing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructionswhich execute on the computer or other programmable data processingapparatus create a means for implementing the functions specified in theflowchart block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable memory that can direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readablememory produce an article of manufacture including computer-readableinstructions for implementing the function specified in the flowchartblock or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loadedonto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to causea series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or otherprogrammable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process suchthat the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmableapparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in theflowchart block or blocks.

Accordingly, blocks of the block diagram and flowchart illustrationsupport combinations of means for performing the specified functions,combinations of steps for performing the specified functions and programinstruction means for performing the specified functions. It will alsobe understood that each block of the block diagram and flowchartillustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagram andflowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purposehardware-based computer systems that perform the specified functions orsteps, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computerinstructions.

The figures present an overview of an embodiment of a computer readablemedium for use with the methods disclosed herein. Results can bedelivered to a gateway (remote computer via the Internet or satellite)for in graphical user interface format. The described system can be usedwith an algorithm, such as those disclosed herein.

As may be understood from the figures, in this implementation, thecomputer may include a processing unit that communicates with otherelements. Also included in the computer readable medium may be an outputdevice and an input device for receiving and displaying data. Thisdisplay device/input device may be, for example, a keyboard or pointingdevice that is used in combination with a monitor. The computer systemmay further include at least one storage device, such as a hard diskdrive, a floppy disk drive, a CD Rom drive, SD disk, optical disk drive,or the like for storing information on various computer-readable media,such as a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk, or a CD-ROM disk. Aswill be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, each of thesestorage devices may be connected to the system bus by an appropriateinterface. The storage devices and their associated computer-readablemedia may provide nonvolatile storage. It is important to note that thecomputer described above could be replaced by any other type of computerin the art. Such media include, for example, magnetic cassettes, flashmemory cards and digital video disks.

Further comprising an embodiment of the system can be a networkinterface controller. One skilled in the art will appreciate that thesystems and methods disclosed herein can be implemented via a gatewaythat comprises a general-purpose computing device in the form of acomputing device or computer.

One or more of several possible types of bus structures can be used aswell, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, anaccelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of avariety of bus architectures. By way of example, such architectures cancomprise an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Micro ChannelArchitecture (MCA) bus, an Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, a Video ElectronicsStandards Association (VESA) local bus, an Accelerated Graphics Port(AGP) bus, and a Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI), a PCI-Expressbus, a Personal Computer Memory Card Industry Association (PCMCIA),Universal Serial Bus (USB) and the like. The bus, and all busesspecified in this description can also be implemented over a wired orwireless network connection and each of the subsystems, including theprocessor , a mass storage device, an operating system, networkinterface controller, Input/Output Interface, and a display device, canbe contained within one or more remote computing devices at physicallyseparate locations, connected through buses of this form, in effectimplementing a fully distributed system.

The computer typically comprises a variety of computer readable media.Exemplary readable media can be any available media that is accessibleby the computer and comprises, for example and not meant to be limiting,both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.The system memory comprises computer readable media in the form ofvolatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM), and/or non-volatilememory, such as read only memory (ROM).

In another aspect, the computer can also comprise otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.For example and not meant to be limiting, a mass storage device can be ahard disk, a removable magnetic disk, a removable optical disk, magneticcassettes or other magnetic storage devices, flash memory cards, CD-ROM,digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, random accessmemories (RAM), read only memories (ROM), electrically erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EEPROM), and the like.

Optionally, any number of program modules can be stored on the massstorage device, including by way of example, an operating system andcomputational software. Each of the operating system and computationalsoftware (or some combination thereof) can comprise elements of theprogramming and the computational software. Data can also be stored onthe mass storage device. Data can also be stored in any of one or moredatabases known in the art. Examples of such databases comprise, DB2™,MICROSOFT™ ACCESS, MICROSOFT™ SQL Server, ORACLE™, mySQL, PostgreSQL,and the like. The databases can be centralized or distributed acrossmultiple systems.

In another aspect, the user can enter commands and information into thecomputer 102 via an input device. Examples of such input devicescomprise, but are not limited to, a keyboard, pointing device (e.g., a“mouse”), a microphone, a joystick, a scanner, tactile input devicessuch as gloves, and other body coverings, and the like These and otherinput devices can be connected to the processing unit via a humanmachine interface that is coupled to the network interface controller,but can be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as aparallel port, game port, an IEEE 1394 Port (also known as a Firewireport), a serial port, or a universal serial bus (USB).

In yet another aspect, a display device can also be connected to thesystem bus via an interface, such as a display adapter. It iscontemplated that the computer can have more than one display adapterand the computer can have more than one display device. For example, adisplay device can be a monitor, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), or aprojector. In addition to the display device, other output peripheraldevices can comprise components such as speakers and a printer which canbe connected to the computer via Input/Output Interface. Any step and/orresult of the methods can be output in any form to an output device.Such output can be any form of visual representation, including, but notlimited to, textual, graphical, animation, audio, tactile, and the like.

The computer can operate in a networked environment. By way of example,a remote computing device can be a personal computer, portable computer,a server, a router, a network computer, a peer device, sensor node, orother common network node, and so on. Logical connections between thecomputer and a remote computing device can be made via a local areanetwork (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), or any other form of anetwork. Such network connections can be through a network adapter. Anetwork adapter can be implemented in both wired and wirelessenvironments. Such networking environments are conventional andcommonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets,and other networks such as the Internet.

Any of the disclosed methods can be performed by computer readableinstructions embodied on computer readable media. Computer readablemedia can be any available media that can be accessed by a computer. Byway of example and not meant to be limiting, computer readable media cancomprise “computer storage media” and “communications media.” “Computerstorage media” comprise volatile and non-volatile, removable andnon-removable media implemented in any methods or technology for storageof information such as computer readable instructions, data structures,program modules, or other data. Exemplary computer storage mediacomprises, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory orother memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or otheroptical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic diskstorage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which canbe used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by acomputer.

The methods and systems described herein can employ ArtificialIntelligence techniques such as machine learning and iterative learning.Examples of such techniques include, but are not limited to, expertsystems, case-based reasoning, Bayesian networks, behavior based AI,neural networks, fuzzy systems, evolutionary computation (e.g. geneticalgorithms), swarm intelligence (e.g. ant algorithms), and hybridintelligent systems (e.g. Expert inference rules generated through aneural network or production rules from statistical learning).

REFERENCES

-   1. Q. Zhan, “Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to    applications,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 1-57 (2009).-   2. A. F. Abouraddy and K. C. Toussaint, “Three-dimensional    polarization control in microscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 153901    (2006).-   3. Q. Zhan and J. R. Leger, “Focus shaping using cylindrical vector    beams,” Opt. Express 10, 324-331 (2002).-   4. M. G. Donato, S. Vasi, R. Sayed, P. H. Jones, F.    Bonaccorso, A. C. Ferrari, P. G. Gucciardi, and O. M. Maragò,    “Optical trapping of nanotubes with cylindrical vector beams,” Opt.    Lett. 37, 3381-3383 (2012).-   5. H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, A. Forbes, M. V. Berry, M. R.    Dennis, D. L. Andrews, M. Mansuripur, C. Denz, C. Alpmann, P.    Banzer, T. Bauer, E. Karimi, L. Marrucci, M. Padgett, M.    Ritsch-Marte, N. M. Litchinitser, N. P. Bigelow, C.    Rosales-Guzmán, A. Belmonte, J. P. Torres, T. W., Neely, M.    Baker, R. Gordon, A. B. Stilgoe, J. Romero, A. G. White, R.    Fickler, A. E. Willner, G. Xie, B. McMorran, and A. M. Weiner,    “Roadmap on structured light,” J. Opt. 19, 013001 (2017).-   6. M. Beresna, M. Gecevi ̆cius, and P. G. Kazansky, “Polarization    sensitive elements fabricated by femtosecond laser nanostructuring    of glass,” Opt. Mater. Express 1, 783-795 (2011).-   7. G. Milione, T. A. Nguyen, J. Leach, D. A. Nolan, and R. R.    Alfano, “Using the nonseparability of vector beams to encode    information for optical communication,” Opt. Lett. 40, 4887-4890    (2015).-   8. G. Milione, M. P. J. Lavery, H. Huang, Y. Ren, G. Xie, T. A.    Nguyen, E. Karimi, L. Marrucci, D. A. Nolan, R. R. Alfano, and A. E.    Willner, “4×20 gbit/s mode division multiplexing over free space    using vector modes and a q-plate mode (de)multiplexer,” Opt. Lett.    40, 1980-1983 (2015).-   9. Y. Zhao and J. Wang, “High-base vector beam encoding/decoding for    visible-light communications,” Opt. Lett. 40, 4843-4846 (2015).-   10. A. Sit, F. Bouchard, R. Fickler, J. Gagnon-Bischoff, H.    Larocque, K. Heshami, D. Elser, C. Peuntinger, K. Günthner, B.    Heim, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi,    “High-dimensional intracity quantum cryptography with structured    photons,” Optica 4, 1006-1010 (2017).-   11. C. Maurer, A. Jesacher, S. Fürhapter, S. Bernet, and M.    Ritsch-Marte, “Tailoring of arbitrary optical vector beams,” New J    Phys 9, 78 (2007).-   12. X.-L. Wang, J. Ding, W.-J. Ni, C.-S. Guo, and H.-T. Wang,    “Generation of arbitrary vector beams with a spatial light modulator    and a common path interferometric arrangement,” Opt. Lett. 32,    3549-3551 (2007).-   13. L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, “Optical spin-to-orbital    angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media,”    Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 163905 (2006).-   14. S. Slussarenko, A. Murauski, T. Du, V. Chigrinov, L. Marrucci,    and E. Santamato, “Tunable liquid crystal q-plates with arbitrary    topological charge,” Opt. Express 19, 4085-4090 (2011).-   15. F. Cardano, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, C. de Lisio,    and E. Santamato, “Polarization pattern of vector vortex beams    generated by q-plates with different topological charges,” Appl.    Opt. 51, C1-C6 (2012).-   16. G. Volpe and D. Petrov, “Generation of cylindrical vector beams    with few-mode fibers excited by laguerre-gaussian beams,” Opt.    Commun. 237, 89-95 (2004).-   17. S. Ramachandran, P. Kristensen, and M. F. Yan, “Generation and    propagation of radially polarized beams in optical fibers,” Opt.    Lett. 34, 2525-2527 (2009).-   18. Z. Zhao, J. Wang, S. Li, and A. E. Willner, “Metamaterials-based    broadband generation of orbital angular momentum carrying vector    beams,” Opt. Lett. 38, 932-934 (2013).-   19. A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, and A. Faraon, “Dielectric    metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with    subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission,” Nat.    Nanotechnol 10, 937-943 (2015).-   20. J. S. Tyo, D. L. Goldstein, D. B. Chenault, and J. A. Shaw,    “Review of passive imaging polarimetry for remote sensing    applications,” Appl. Opt. 45, 5453-5469 (2006).-   21. B. Ndagano, I. Nape, B. Perez-Garcia, S. Scholes, R. I.    Hernandez-Aranda, T. Konrad, M. P. Lavery, and A. Forbes, “A    deterministic detector for vector vortex states,” Sci. Rep. 7, 13882    (2017).-   22. M. McLaren, T. Konrad, and A. Forbes, “Measuring the    nonseparability of vector vortex beams,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 023833    (2015).-   23. D. Malacara, Optical Shop Testing (Wiley, New York, 1978).-   24. J. Hartmann, “Bemerkungen''uber den bau and die justirung von    spektrographen,” Zt. Instrumentenkd. 29, 47 (1900).-   25. R. V. Shack and B. C. Platt, “Production and use of a lenticular    Hartmann screen (abstract),” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 656 (1971).-   26. R. N. Smartt and J. Strong, “Point-diffraction interferometer    (abstract),” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 737 (1972).-   27. K. L. Marshall, K. Adelsberger, G. Myhre, and D. W. Griffin,    “The lcpdi-A compact and robust phase-shifting point-diffraction    interferometer based on dye-doped lc technology,” Molecular Crystals    and Liquid Crystals 454, 23/[425]−45/[447] (2006).-   28. R. M. Neal and J. C. Wyant, “Polarization phase-shifting point    diffraction interferometer,” Appl. Opt. 45, 3463-3476 (2006).-   29. J. R. Fienup, “Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison,” Appl.    Opt. 21, 2758-2769 (1982).-   30. G. Sirat and D. Psaltis, “Conoscopic holography,” Opt. Lett. 10,    4-6 (1985).-   31. K. Buse and M. Luennemann, “3d imaging: Wave front sensing    utilizing a birefringent crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3385-3387    (2000).-   32. R. Ragazzoni, E. Marchetti, and F. Rigaut, “Modal tomography for    adaptive optics,” Astron. Astrophys. 342, L53-L56 (1999).-   33. E. Wolf, “Solution of the phase problem in the theory of    structure determination of crystals from x-ray diffraction    experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 075501 (2009).-   34. J. S. Lundeen, B. Sutherland, A. Patel, C. Stewart, and C.    Bamber, “Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction,” Nature    474, 188 (2011).-   35. J. S. Lundeen and C. Bamber, “Procedure for direct measurement    of general quantum states using weak measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.    108, 070402 (2012).-   36. S. Wu, “State tomography via weak measurements,” Sci. Rep. 3,    1193 (2013).-   37. M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Magaña Loaiza, S. M. Hashemi Rafsanjani,    and R. W. Boyd, “Compressive direct measurement of the quantum wave    function,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 090402 (2014).-   38. J. Z. Salvail, M. Agnew, A. S. Johnson, E. Bolduc, J. Leach,    and R. W. Boyd, “Full characterization of polarization states of    light via direct measurement,” Nat. Photonics 7, 316-321 (2013).-   39. M. Malik, M. Mirhosseini, M. P. Lavery, J. Leach, M. J. Padgett,    and R. W. Boyd, “Direct measurement of a 27-dimensional    orbital-angularmomentum state vector,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3115 (2014).-   40. Z. Shi, M. Mirhosseini, J. Margiewicz, M. Malik, F. Rivera, Z.    Zhu, and R. W. Boyd, “Scan-free direct measurement of an extremely    high dimensional photonic state,” Optica 2, 388-392 (2015).-   41. B. Perez-Garcia, C. López-Mariscal, R. I. Hernandez-Aranda,    and J. C. Gutiérrez-Vega, “On-demand tailored vector beams,” Appl.    Opt. 56, 6967-6972 (2017).-   42. J. A. Davis, D. M. Cottrell, J. Campos, M. J. Yzuel, and I.    Moreno, “Encoding amplitude information onto phase-only filters,”    Appl. Opt. 38, 5004-5013 (1999).-   43. V. Arrizón, U. Ruiz, R. Canada, and L. A. González, “Pixelated    phase computer holograms for the accurate encoding of scalar complex    fields,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 24, 3500-3507 (2007).-   44. Q. Zhan, “Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts    to applications,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 1-57 (2009).-   45. A. M. Beckley, T. G. Brown, and M. A. Alonso, “Full poincaré    beams,” Opt. Express 18, 10777-10785 (2010).

It should be understood that while the present disclosure has beenprovided in detail with respect to certain illustrative and specificaspects thereof, it should not be considered limited to such, asnumerous modifications are possible without departing from the broadspirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined in the appendedclaims. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims cover allsuch equivalent variations as fall within the true spirit and scope ofthe invention.

1. A computerized method of transmitting data via an optical vectorbeam, the method comprising: encoding the data onto a primary opticalbeam to form the optical vector beam, wherein the encoding comprisesdifferential spatial phase shift keying (DSPSK) in which the data isrepresented according to respective polarization states and physicalchanges in the optical vector beam for the respective polarizationstates across spatially separated portions of the optical vector beam;decoding the data by identifying the respective polarization states andrespective complex intensity measurements for the spatially separatedportions of the optical vector beam by: (i) selecting, from thespatially separated portions of the optical vector beam, at least twoorthogonally polarized portions of the optical vector beam; and (ii)identifying the data in the optical vector beam by tracking differencesbetween the respective complex intensity measurements for the at leasttwo orthogonally polarized portions of the optical vector beam.
 2. Thecomputerized method of claim 1, wherein the decoding comprisescalculating a transverse profile of the optical vector beam in a singleshot of light.
 3. The computerized method of claim 1, further comprisinggenerating the primary vector beam by generating at least one of avector vortex beam and a full Poincaré beam of light.
 4. Thecomputerized method of claim 1, further comprising generating theprimary vector beam by superimposing at least two orthogonally polarizedscalar beams onto each other.
 5. The computerized method of claim 4,further comprising decoding the data by applying a transverse shiftbetween a selected two beams of the at least two orthogonally polarizedscalar beams such that the selected two beams are non-overlapping. 6.The computerized method of claim 5, further comprising adjustingpolarization of the selected two beams into a single horizontal linearpolarization and forming a spatially coherent scalar beam of the singlehorizontal linear polarization.
 7. The computerized method of claim 6,further comprising applying a polarization rotation to the spatiallycoherent scalar beam to form a new wave field having a horizontalpolarization component and a vertical polarization component.
 8. Thecomputerized method of claim 7, further comprising detecting the newwave field at an image plane of an imaging system and converting thehorizontal polarization component to a right circular polarizationcomponent (RCP) and converting the vertical polarization component tothe left circular polarization component (LCP).
 9. The computerizedmethod of claim 8, further comprising detecting the new wave field at adetection plane of the imaging system and calculating a transverselinear field profile of the new wave field according to linear valuesfor horizontal field intensity (Ih), vertical field intensity (Iv),diagonal field intensity (Id), and anti-diagonal field intensity (Ia).10. The computerized method of claim 9, further comprising using thetransverse linear field profile and the linear values Ih, Iv, Id, and Iato calculate proportional real and imaginary parts of a transversecomplex intensity field profile of the selected two beams.
 11. Thecomputerized method of claim 9, further comprising selecting two of thelinear values as directional intensity values and characterizing thedata encoded onto the optical vector beam by calculating a differencebetween the two directional intensity values.
 12. The computerizedmethod of claim 1, wherein encoding the data onto the primary opticalbeam comprises: directing the primary optical beam to a first spatiallight modulator; receiving the primary optical beam and an imprintedhologram at the first spatial light modulator; using the first spatiallight modulator and the hologram, converting the primary optical beaminto the optical vector beam having spatially separated and orthogonallypolarized twin beam portions; radially separating the twin beam portionssuch that polarized components of the twin beam portions arenon-overlapping; adjusting the polarized components of the twin beamportions into a common horizontal linear polarization state to adjustthe optical vector beam into a spatially-coherent scalar beam of asingle polarization.
 13. A system of encoding and decoding datatransmitted in an optical beam, the system comprising: a photon sourceemitting a primary optical beam; at least one spatial light modulatorreceiving the primary optical beam and input mode twin beams encodingpolarization data onto the primary optical beam to form an encodedoptical vector beam; a polarizing imaging apparatus receiving theencoded optical vector beam from the at least one spatial lightmodulator; a polarization beam splitter connected to the polarizingimaging apparatus and separating the encoded optical vector beam intooutput twin beams of respective polarization states; a computerconnected to the polarizing imaging apparatus and the polarization beamsplitter and decoding the optical vector beam by calculating adifference between two directional intensity values associated with eachof the output twin beams.
 14. A system according to claim 13, whereinthe input mode twin beams encode data across polarization states and/ordirectional intensity amplitudes.
 15. A system according to claim 14,further comprising a hologram generator directing a computer generatedhologram onto the spatial light modulator and forming an updated opticalvector beam carrying the data.
 16. A system according to claim 15,further comprising at least one interferometer receiving the updatedoptical vector beam and directing the updated optical vector beam to anoptical system that converts horizontal and vertical polarizedcomponents of the updated optical vector beam into respective twin beamsof left circular polarization and right circular polarization, producingthe optical vector beam having two circular polarization components. 17.A system according to claim 16, wherein the optical system is a cameracomprising a micro-polarizer array that resolves a transverse linearfield profile of the optical vector beam according to linear values forhorizontal field intensity (Ih), vertical field intensity (Iv), diagonalfield intensity (Id), and anti-diagonal field intensity (Ia).
 18. Asystem according to claim 17, wherein the computer calculatesdifferences between at least two of the linear values to characterizethe input mode twin beams from the optical vector beam and decode thedata.